Bad news for Crumble Cookies – faces $24 million lawsuit for using Taylor Swift, BTS and Beyoncé songs without permission

May 26, 2025
Bad news for Crumble Cookies - faces $24 million lawsuit for using Taylor Swift, BTS and Beyoncé songs without permission

Warner Music Group is seeking up to $150,000 for every single alleged non-authorized song that it claimed Crumbl used with no permission, and it claimed the company used at least 159 sound recordings by Warner artists. The lawsuit was filed this previous week in a Utah federal court, Restaurant Business reported. Crumbl is a Utah-based dessert chain that has expanded nationwide. The music group was seeking nearly $24 million. Read on to get to know all details.

The chain used at least 159 songs over the past years

It claimed that the cookie chain used at least 159 sound recordings by Warner artists including Dua Lipa, BTS, Taylor Swift, Lizzo and Beyoncé, without consent in social media advertisements over the past years.

Warner Music recognized 286 instances in the lawsuit in which Crumbl allegedly used these recordings in videos and argued that the company did not remove them even after being notified of the copyright violations, Restaurant Business reported. The lawsuit also explained that Crumbl, along with social media influencers it partners with, used Warner’s recordings with any kind of permission.

“Months after receiving the cease-and-desist letter, Crumbl not only continued to exploit many of the infringing Crumbl videos, but also posted new infringing Crumbl videos,” the lawsuit explained. The lawsuit, in adidiotn, highlights a video posted from Crumbl’s TikTok account in which the company said that “legal said” it “can’t use any trending audios.”

The lawsuit is being reviewed by Crumbl

In a statement, Crumbl said it is reviewing the lawsuit. “Crumbl is conscious of the legal action initiated by Warner Music Group and is actively reviewing the issue. Crumbl respects the rights of artists and creators and will respond appropriately through the legal process. In the meantime, we remain focused on innovation, strengthening our community, and bringing friends and families together.”

Crumbl is not the first restaurant chain sued over copyright infringement. The Beastie Boys sued Chili’s last year for non authorized use of its song “Sabotage.” Sony Music Entertainment sued Marriott International the previous year for likely reasons.

The quick growth of TikTok has created such problems for companies as the push for content usually leads to demand to use trending music. At the time companies do this, nevertheless, it modificates from simple posts by regular users to corporate marketing.

Crumbl, which operates more than 1,000 locations and is looking for a buyer, has used social media in an agressive way since its emergence in 2017. Those videos have played a key role in the chain’s growth and ongoing popularity. The company has 9.8 million followers on TikTok and 6.1 million on Instagram.

For waht Crumbl is known for: its revoling cookies menu

Crumbl is commonly known for its revolving menu of cookies and, more recently, cakes and pies. If we take a look to the lawsuit, the company will use music related to some of the items in the video, such as the use of the song “Blueberry Faygo” by Lil Mosey to promote a blueberry cheesecake cookie. A Kentucky Butter Cake cookie was promoted with the song “Butter” by BTS, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit, in addition, argued that Crumbl represented that the music was “original audio” byt the same time it was copyrighted. The complaint noted that both TikTok and Instagram forbid unauthorized use of copyrighted music.

Warner in its complaint also referred to Crumbl’s own history of pushing back against copyright infringement. It cited the company’s since-settled lawsuit against the cookie chain Dirty Dough, and Crumbl over the years has aggressively gone after upstart companies that it said mimicked its business. “Crumbl is not unfamiliar with intellectual property laws and enforces its own intellectual property rights by filing lawsuits against companies that allegedly infringe against Crumbl’s intellectual property,” the lawsuit explained.